Op-Eds Speaking Truth to the Powers-That-Be

Mitt Romney Will Say Anything to Get Elected, but Can He Remember What He Stands For?

On Sunday, Mitt Romney deigned to grant an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press. Although hardly the rough pointed questions that one may expect,(David Gregory is the host after all), there were some striking questions, responses and (GASP) actual follow-ups that begged the obvious question: Is Mitt Romney even clear on what Mitt Romney’s platform actually is?

When asked about balancing the budget, Romney stated that he would not give a bunch of tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires, but that he would bring the marginal tax rates down, then close loopholes for top earners.

Gregory asked the correct question, for a change: “Specifically, what loopholes would you close?”

Romney couldn’t answer it. He continued to vaguely talk about closing loopholes, but lowering rates, dancing away from specifics.

“People at the high end, high income taxpayers, are going to have fewer deductions and exemptions,” Romney said. “Those numbers are going to come down. Otherwise they’d get a tax break.” [1]

Isn’t that raising taxes? Something guaranteed to run afoul of Grover Norquist, de facto tax policy maker for the GOP and his legion of American Taliban in Congress?

Romney went on to say that he wouldn’t be raising taxes on the middle class, but lowering them as all of the tax rates would be lower. He didn’t discuss how he managed to balance a budget in this manner, only citing that studies from the GOP/TEA parties collective institutions of the over educated liberal elite at Harvard and Princeton, as well as the Wall Street Journal and the American Enterprise Institute, that this wouldn’t add to the deficit in any way, but that it would reduce it over time.  It’s a trickle-down economics without the label, already repeatedly disproven by more reliable sources such as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and major economists [2]

How much time and money the government would lose and its effect on the well-being and prosperity of the middle class and poor are questions that it would take electing Romney and Ryan to find out.

Conservative estimates are already being tossed around by the media, one being $4 Trillion dollars in lost revenue over the next ten years. [3]

Perhaps my math isn’t as good as Governor Romney’s.  That seems to be a deficit going up, not down.

When asked how soon he would balance the budget, Romney replied that he would do so by the end of his second term.

That’s right folks, he said second.

He went on to say that to do so now would have a “dramatic impact” on the economy.  Which, even though Mr. Gregory missed it, is Mr. Romney’s tacit admission that President Obama’s current course of action with the economy is actually working. You’d jump all over a “broken” plan with this kind of stimulus if there was a real, not phony, financial crisis, right?  We’ve had 36 months of straight job creation, and even though the economy is weak, it is growing slowly and the DOW is over 13,000.


Beyond that, Mr. Romney is barely on course to be elected to a first term, let alone a second. His implication that Presidents need two terms to clean up a catastrophic mess, much like the one that George W. Bush and the Republican Congresses of his day put us in, is a tacit endorsement that President Obama deserves another four years.

It begs the question: If he is truly understanding the mess in which we now find ourselves, would he take similar steps to what President Obama has done to repair it?

The presumption that Mr. Romney will have willing partners in the House and Senate is arguable, since Neocons and the Libertarians who control the GOP in Congress have few common interests.  To get any major legislation passed, he would need the complete cooperation of the Democrats, which is not likely to be forthcoming.

So Mr. Romney has a great likelihood that he will find himself a President on a very small island, with only a handful of surviving “RINO” (Republican in Name Only) neocon congressmen and hostile camps of Democrats and Tea Party Taliban on either side.  In short, he stands a greater chance of being less effective at governing than President Obama. 

Governor Romney also talked about Obamacare, not in the way one would expect though. Romney talked about the provisions that he’d like to keep, such as pre-existing conditions and allowing children to stay on their parents insurance into their 20’s.  Of course he put that out there for the Sunday talk audience, then his campaign walked those remarks back eighteen hours later. By Sunday afternoon, the Romney campaign released a statement turning on the idea in its entirety, yet again changing his mind about policy…in the course of few hours. [4]

He’s certainly changing his mind faster these days, at least.

Here’s the thing about elections: They allow us to use our rights to vote for whomever we choose.  You can take any information that you would like to make that decision.

With the misinformation and ever-changing positions coming out of the Romney campaign, I don’t know how anyone can trust him long enough to cast their vote for him on November 6th.

We listen to the lies and flip-flops. Mr. Romney wants us to forget about the pesky details, and have faith that, in January 2013, he’ll get his act together.


We can vote for the guy who kept the economy from floundering into a Depression, kept private sector job growth positive for the last 3-1/2 years, kept America safe from terrorism, stood up for women’s reproductive rights and the LGBT community, cut taxes for working Americans, and has only asked that the elites in a country with the most disproportionate wealth distribution of any major capitalist economy pay a paltry 3% more income tax, just as they did in the 1990s.  Oh, and someone who has displayed patience, grace, and true character all along the way in the face of the greatest partisan political opposition since the administration of Abraham Lincoln.

One thing is clear: Mr. Romney will say anything to be the President.  What isn’t clear is: What does he REALLY believe when he’s not telling this or that group what he thinks that they want to hear, and then reverses himself every 18 hours or so?

Mitt wants you to trust him. Given his erratic daily flip-floppery, has he earned that trust, though?

About LPB

This is a "what's going on in the world" type of blog. Any and everything that interests me could make the cut! Politics, current events, fashion, television...we'll just have to see how I'm feeling that day.

2 comments on “Mitt Romney Will Say Anything to Get Elected, but Can He Remember What He Stands For?

  1. Pingback: Marketing Lessons from the 2012 Election | Evolve Communications

  2. Suzanne Rosser
    November 13, 2012

    I am really enjoying your clarity of thought & humor.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on September 11, 2012 by in 2012, Campaign 2012, GOP, Mitt Romney, Republicans, Years and tagged , , , , , , , , .

The Past on T2P

Stay Connected.

Catch up. Catch on! Text T2Power to 22828!

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Top Posts & Pages

Women Docs as Leaders: We’re Still a 16 Percent Ghetto
U.S. Economy 101 (in Plain English, with Humor!): How the GOP and the Media Are Shucking You
The Koch Brothers Contango Strategy: Oil Prices as Political WMD Against Obama
In Guns We Trust
The More Movie Critics Think They Know About "Now You See Me," the Less They Know

Get Forward Thinking

Sign up here for Forward Thinking, a monthly newsletter delivered to your email box with special features from the various RossGroupFT publications, including new titles from RossBooksFT.
For Email Marketing you can trust

Copyright Notice

The (T2P) website and all text, design and artwork elements not part of the standard WordPress template or an article, and all T2P logos and trademarks are copyright ©2011 and future years by TheRossGroupFT, LLC. All rights reserved. All articles' text is the copyright of its author. T2P is a forum for free speech of its invited authors, and the opinions and information that they present are their own. TheRossGroupFT, its principals, agents and assigns are not responsible for the opinions or content of any article.
TheRossGroupFT - Forward Thinking for New Media

Writing for T2P

We're looking for passionate, out-of-the-box, outside-the-Beltway writing and thinking. To find out more about how to audition your work for us, click here.

About Truth-2-Power

A phrase coined by the Quakers during in the mid-1950's, "Speak truth to power," was a call for the United States to stand firm against fascism and other forms of totalitarianism; it is a phrase that seems to unnerve political right, with reason. The Founding Fathers of United States risked their lives in order to speak truth to the power of King George and the mighty British Empire. It was and is considered courageous. Join us!

The Forward Thinking Store

The t2p Tee

Get your t2p gear at the Forward-Thinking Store

Share us on LinkedIN

%d bloggers like this: