Op-Eds Speaking Truth to the Powers-That-Be

What Happens When the Far Right Really Ends Birth Control? The Malthusian Nightmare GOP Style

Rick Santorum and the men of the GOP rail on about Right-to-Life issues.  It’s a Republican conundrum: Appeasing the Religious Right creates a nightmarish welfare state abhorrent to selfish Libertarian and fiscal conservatives that, unchecked, could bring about the devolution of mankind.  Sounds too strong? Read on.

When you think, a scary word for imperious idiots like Rick Santorum, the whole “Right-to-life” process through, there shouldn’t be a fiscal Republican within miles of restructuring of reproductive rights.

The millenia-old rationales for religious prohibitions on birth control have more to do with generating more true believers, and able hands to work the fields, than they do with more heavenly pursuits.  They do not function in a world that has increased lifespans, surgically narrowed wars, reduced famines, improved food production, and slowed the ravages of catastrophic diseases.

Political economist Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) projected that, if wars and pestilence didn’t get the human race, reducing those population controls would ultimately impact the food supply to the point that the human race devolved backwards in search of basic needs.

In the subsequent centuries, economists have extended that projection to include other finite resources that are the backbone of the developed world, from crude oil and electricity to rare earths used to make everything from TV sets to toasters.

Known commonly as the Malthusian Nightmare, unleashing the reproductive genie from the gene lamp, in which 9 of 10 child-bearing women usually keep it, would bring about an economic plague that only population-swollen China struggles with. It’s a world, 99%ers, where the 1% becomes the .005%, and gets richer.

You might think, in some dark way, that oppressing even larger numbers of people might be the libertarian appeal, but many Dead Billionaires Club members, including Jeremiah Millbank of the JM Foundation and the RJ Reynolds scions are connected to families who were big preachers of Eugenics, the forced sterilizations of poor women in this country that were their ticket to public assistance.  Popularized in the 1920s by Malthus-phobes, eugenics were the groundwork of the Nazi’s “final solution.”

Want to feed yourself? Get sterilized.

Global warming is the other end-game that Malthus did not consider.  As the population swells and the resources they consume deplete even more rapidly, scientists forecast the after-effects which the GOP dub “climate change” may solve the population problem by drowning hundreds of millions of us, burning us to a crisp with a compromised upper atmosphere, and making much of our best agricultural land unusable for millenia.

You would think that guys like Mitt Romney, who supposedly understand supply and demand, would get this.

Let’s say, though, that they can’t put another cork on the birth bottle.  What might happen on the road to that future?

Abstinence? I think not.  Some may try, but go to the diaper box there are going to be more babies. Hundreds of millions of them world-wide and a population pushing a billion here in decades.

Responsibility? In-your-bedroom fascists like the House Republican Teahadis could write up a law that says that the man who gets a woman pregnant has to marry her.  Then father just takes off, or simply avoids their responsibility.  Then there are those exceptions: What happens if a man gets three women pregnant on the same week? What do we throw at that?  We jail them?  Bring them back from another state to face their responsibility?

Watch the cost of our justice system skyrocket, for everything from prisons to law enforcement, and the backlog in family court, already bad, explode.

There would be a ton of single mothers out there. Sure the Religious Right also frowns upon this.  They have no choice though, as you can’t legislate modular families.

Most single mothers take a lot longer to reach their full earning potential, if they ever get there. Many struggle to make it, often shifting the burden back on to families also struggling to make it.  When they have no support mechanism, Republicans tell them to seek out the church, and charity.

Many, desperate for some relief, might.  A lot of them, though, won’t be able to handle being moms, or won’t want to.  They would abandon their children to adoption, or sell them to what is sure to be a growing slave trade to get a little money to eat and carry on. It happens in overcrowded population centers all over the world. Pushed to the same conditions of poverty, it would happen here.

Even assuming that the GOP could sell the highly unconstitutional concept of forcing people to seek out faith-based institutions to feed, clothe and shelter themselves, as the Bush Administration attempted, how would these religious organizations, which struggle to deal with a few million people, deal with ten, twenty, or even one hundred times the number of poor women and their off-spring who can’t care for themselves?

Intentionally creating single moms carries a staggering cost.

True, some jobs might come back. With a swelling U.S. workforce that would start to look like Bangladesh, and rapidly devolving middle class crashed into poverty, workers for manual labor tasks like factory jobs could be had on the cheap. If the single moms could find someplace to keep their kids long enough to work the low-wage hours.  In some Chinese factories they have daycare, if you consider a room with a few toys and a couple of people herding kids daycare for people who put in 80 hour weeks for $.70/hr.  That’s the kind of hours that Chinese workers were putting into building Etch-A-Sketches for American kids who live far better.

Churches would have to increase fees, tithes, whatever, to levels that would drive membership from the church, or bankrupt them.  So the only way to pay for all of the aid would fall back upon the care provider of last resort: The government.

The Far Right’s über-bogeyman, that nasty socialist State, would have to take over the care of a lot of these children that their intolerance of reproductive rights have brought into the population.  Billions-upon-billions of dollars would be siphoned out of the Treasury to nearly decade after decade of care, education, etc.

It would be a welfare state the likes of which no world government has ever seen.  It would create a collapse far more epic than the Roman empire, or any of the Fox News histrionics about the debt ceiling last summer.

Oh, and if you think that the house you live in, that fat pad in your bank account, and the fancy car that you drive insulate you or your grand, great-grand or great-greats, think again.

On the track proposed by the Republican Religious Zombies, the slide for all but a handful of wealthy families is pretty much assured.

Right now we’re experiencing a “boomlet” in population in the elementary years that’s an aftermath of the “baby boom” of post World War II.  According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 78.5M people were in school in 2010:

  • 41.7M students in nursery to elementary;
  • 16.6M in high school
  • 20.3M in college and graduate school

With only 37M of college age or approaching, schools of “higher learning” are getting staggering application numbers: Boston University: 45,000, UCLA: 61,000.  All for 4000 to 8,000 places. Small colleges that never had wait lists are lining people up.  Community colleges are filling up with students who would have been university bound with B+ averages that won’t get them into a school of higher learning now.  The trend will only get worse when the boomlet of WWII great grandchildren, that 41.7M students, hits.

Now imagine what would happen when the number of children seeking higher education out of our system doubles, triples, quintuples, not just for a few years, but permanently?

Colleges would only be for an upper fraction of students.  You can have all of the money in the world, but your precious pea who is academically average is now a taxing turnip with a 3.1, heading down the road of devolution.

Double or triple our student population and the badly under-funded public schools that can barely handle the class loads that they have now would be equally overwhelmed. Home school them, as Rick Santorum does with his kids?  With single moms working one or two jobs that’s not going to fly. You might use the Internet to teach, but the quality of education for all would suffer, to day nothing of the socialization of latch-key children glued to a computer all day.

The less educated a population, the more it devolves.  Malthus 1, Right-to-Lifers 0.

That many more citizens enjoying their life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness also puts more demand into the supply chain for everything from fuel to food to housing.

Enjoy your steak at $5.99/lb. Right-to-Lifers?  It might be harder to do when it’s $57.99/lb. When you put millions more hungry mouths down on the planet, though, they have to eat.

Not possible? Anyone remember the .50 cent cheeseburger of the 1960s. It costs between a McDonalds subsidized $1.00 and $15.00 today with the average going around $5.00.  A gallon of milk is $3.69, subsidized by markets’ shifting of mark-ups to other items. Unsubsidized as is it would be $5.39 or more. A gallon of gas is unsubsidized and getting mighty close to the milk price.

Retirement?  With millions of people unable to care for themselves, someone has to.  Perhaps not.  It may be fiscally impossible for society to care for the elderly. Then you end up with dystopic extremes of a Logan’s Run the 1967 novel where they install eugenics machines for population control. At a set age, people voluntarily walk in and incinerate themselves to maintain the balance.

Sadly, unless we would return to women the right to control when they choose to be pregnant, or if they want that at all,  there would be no stopping it.

Legally, should the Religious whack-jobs get their way, they will face the constitutional consequences: If a society is allowed to dictate the terms of the conception of a human being, and hamper the prevention of unwanted pregnancies, then that same society becomes fully responsible for that life .  If you legislate life, you become obligated to insure its rights to life, liberty, and its pursuit of happiness under that same legal system.

The Chinese don’t know what to do with a billion poor hungry rurals. No matter how much “prosperity” they can report on paper, it never trickles down beyond the fraction of 1% of the top Communist Party members and the billionaires they co-opt into the party.

Hey, that’s not unlike what Mr. Santorum, Mr. Romney and Mr. Gingrich are proposing with such radicalization of fiscal and social policy in diametrically opposite directions.

They talk about not being China.  Yet by their policies, they almost assure that we will be, and that this country will be doomed to devolution when the numbers just add up beyond capacity.  It’s the Republican policy conundrum which they refuse to address.

Think of the ride waits with your grandkids at Disneyworld, assuming you could afford the $35K a night for a room.

My shiny two.

About Brian Ross

Brian Ross is a writer, screenwriter, political satirist, documentarian and short filmmaker who blogs for Truth2Power, the Huffington Post, and the Daily KOS, among others.

5 comments on “What Happens When the Far Right Really Ends Birth Control? The Malthusian Nightmare GOP Style

  1. thedrpete
    March 24, 2012

    An obviously-schooled Brian Ross. An obviously-devious, -demagogic, and -obfuscating Brian Ross. I hate to comment, because otherwise he’d just be the sound of one hand clapping.

    Rick Santorum has proposed no law to restrict contraception in any way. Nor any law to promote conception in any way. Ditto Newt Gingrich. Ditto Mitt Romney. So the predicate of this entire screed is sheer folly.

    The right to life isn’t a Republican or a “right-wing” idea. It is from the laws of nature and nature’s Creator, and is an unalienable right.

    No one can, or can be made responsible for another’s life. That one can be made responsible to insure someone else’s pursuit of happiness is pandering-pathetic nonsequitur.

  2. Brian Ross
    March 24, 2012

    Dr. Pete: You’re still sitting too close to the TV with Fox News on. Santorum, Gingrich and Romney have all backed the Virginia law and other such restrictions on birth control.

    It’s not an inalienable right (not “unalienable” either) Even the farthest Right of the Supremes doesn’t confer Constitutional rights to eggs and sperm.

    As to the latter part of your rant, everyone is responsible for another’s life, even one as horribly delusional as yours. If your house burns, the fire department comes out to help. My taxes, and those of others, help pay for that service. If someone mugs you, the Policeman giving you lip service also is on the community dime. And should your broker bogart Bahama-bound with your imagined billions, the SEC, the courts, and the FBI, all community funded, would come to your aid. That flows from my previous ideas like water from a fountain Petey…

    Have a great night. I hear they’re having an O’Reilly marathon on Fox. Don’t stay up too late. You need to keep your eyes on all of us liberals…

    • thedrpete
      March 25, 2012

      I’ve learned something here, Mr. Ross. As to “schooled” you’ve been indoctrinated, not educated. Most of what you know just isn’t so.

      You don’t understand the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and their relationship. You don’t understand natural rights. You don’t understand the concept of separation of powers and the constitutional role of the Supreme Court. You don’t understand American sovereignty relationships.

      American progressives began taking over government education in about 1840, and have been incredibly effective, including, it would seem, with you. They sought indoctrinated knee-jerk lemmings without critical thinking.

      I’m out.

      • Brian Ross
        March 26, 2012

        I’ll tell you something Pete… Come as close to the monitor as you get to Meghan Kelly over at Fox.. Shhh… I don’t speak about something without… I know this is going to be shocking… FACTS. Sustainable, checkable, verifiable facts. You are very entertaining. You speak from your beliefs with great passion, but very little else. You trip over inconvenient factoids, like all three of the candidates actually endorsing these laws in print and on video. I know. It’s hard to make a case when someone on your side is just working so hard to prove you wrong. Bring your A game here, and we’re good. You speak, be prepared to show where you are getting your facts from. It kills about 99% of most pro-GOP ranters. Oh, and I’d avoid Fox. They blow it on the credibility meters a lot.

  3. thedrpete
    March 27, 2012

    First, Brian, the self-admittedly-librral Annenburg School of Communications at the University of Pennsylvania extensive research cincluded that the most-objective tv news was a tie between the evening news on FNC and the PBS with Lehrer. All others were way way behind. Second, I’ve not seen a single minute of FNC in 12 days.

    A quick quiz for you, oh master of the facts.

    1. The hierarchy of human sovereignty is

    a. National government over state government over local government over individuals.
    b. States over national over local over individuals.
    c. Each individual on Planet Earth over anything else. Community over local over state over national.

    2. If I accept your contention that the Republican candidates all say they want it to be illegal to take contraception — which I don’t — are they saying that as POTUS they’d

    a. legislate that Virginia pass such a law?
    b. Executive-order that Virginia follow said as federal mandate?
    c. send federal law enforcemnet to enforce said order?
    d. other? _________________________

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Past on T2P

Stay Connected.

Catch up. Catch on! Text T2Power to 22828!

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Top Posts & Pages

Get Forward Thinking

Sign up here for Forward Thinking, a monthly newsletter delivered to your email box with special features from the various RossGroupFT publications, including new titles from RossBooksFT.
For Email Marketing you can trust

Copyright Notice

The (T2P) website and all text, design and artwork elements not part of the standard WordPress template or an article, and all T2P logos and trademarks are copyright ©2011 and future years by TheRossGroupFT, LLC. All rights reserved. All articles' text is the copyright of its author. T2P is a forum for free speech of its invited authors, and the opinions and information that they present are their own. TheRossGroupFT, its principals, agents and assigns are not responsible for the opinions or content of any article.
TheRossGroupFT - Forward Thinking for New Media

Writing for T2P

We're looking for passionate, out-of-the-box, outside-the-Beltway writing and thinking. To find out more about how to audition your work for us, click here.

Follow t2PTweets on Twitter!

About Truth-2-Power

A phrase coined by the Quakers during in the mid-1950's, "Speak truth to power," was a call for the United States to stand firm against fascism and other forms of totalitarianism; it is a phrase that seems to unnerve political right, with reason. The Founding Fathers of United States risked their lives in order to speak truth to the power of King George and the mighty British Empire. It was and is considered courageous. Join us!

LIKE us on Facebook!

The Forward Thinking Store

Get your t2p gear at the Forward-Thinking Store

Share us on LinkedIN

%d bloggers like this: